This is the second part in my breakdown of a BDSM scene. The first part which I wrote a while back was about the preparations that I carry out prior to a scene. One of the main preparations was to create a series of test, mostly behavioural ones that my pet carries out, unknowingly most of the time. These tests are then the base for the creation of specific exercises that are carried out during a scene. The test are also used to find behavioural habits that my pet has, both good and bad ones. I then, of course, want to strengthen the good ones and remove the bad ones.
The next step in the breakdown of a BDSM scene is the Prelude. This step is crucial to both parties because it externalises the intentions and reasons for the specific scene.
This is where I explain to my pet what she has is going to do and sometimes I might reveal the reason, but I like her to realise the reason herself gradually as the exercise is going on. The strongest form of learning occurs when a person comes to a conclusion on their own, rather than being told what to learn.
One of the most important aspects is to explain the purpose of the exercise, through achievable goals or unachievable ones. Goals that are unachievable are quite powerful as they can be used to increase the submissive awareness about their personal limitations. Setting positive goals are equally important, as they create a space for positive reinforcement, in other words praise.
Explanation of an exercise doesn’t have to be explicit in words – It can be explained by creating a revelation that you want the submissive to reach, through the different elements that they have to carry out during the training itself. This is decided by the dominant during the prelude.
During the prelude you also have to make a choice on how to move forward to the training goal that has been established. Some goals are quite complex in themselves to handle in one big package. If that is the case then it might be a good choice to break down a big package in to smaller ones. It makes it easier for the dominant to find opportunities for praise or scolding – And most important of all: It makes it easier to monitor the progress of the training. This is what I call a reductionist training strategy – Break down the complex training schemes in to smaller ones and when each one of the package is executed with perfection; then put it all back together in order to achieve the bigger behavioural change.
Lets put all this into a practical perspective:
I decided to observer my pet’s ability to give her powers to me. I can choose just to observe or create situations where her abilities in this area are put to the test. All this have been decided upon during the preparation phase. Her performance turns out to be bad in this area, so it is time to create some exercises to increase her abilities to turn over her powers to me.
I could have chosen the easy way out and gone for the crude domination strategy. Make her repeat about 500 times that she is to obey her master. But let’s face it – That is too easy and it doesn’t create a long term effect.
Changing her “handing over” abilities is of course a complex goal, and is not achieved through one training session. I decide to break down this complex goal in to smaller ones. I create an exercise based on controlling her habitual behaviour, a good starting point to show the submissive that the dominant is the one that is in control, even when it comes to behaviour that is almost based on reflexes. I decide to start with a word exchange exercise, which means that she has to exchange common words that she uses in her everyday speech with a word of my choice. This is an exercise that require mental energy as it is created to affect her habitual behaviour and it will take her attention of her disobedient tendencies.
This isn’t explained to her in so much detail as I have done here, she is just simply ordered to exchange certain words in her speech and sometimes even writing. This also presents a progress that she can monitor and an goal that is easy to understand on one level. The hidden part is to change her reflexes to establish the fact that the dominant is in control of all her personal aspects, sexual as well as non-sexual.
A good dominant is observant, analytical and patient – These are the abilities that makes both the preparations and the prelude so much easier to carry out. It will also create a framework around the play that makes it easier to understand and interpret.
This sounds like a very analytical, organized, planned method, focussed on … pet cultivation, if i can call it that; awesome, but i wonder if some Dom/mes (with long term pet ownership) plan scenes from other frameworks, or if most use something rather close to this… i would be fascinated to hear, if so.
Also – You mentioned in the preparation phase article about taking notes; i would be curious to hear about what categories of note-taking Dom/me have found to be helpful.
i also am curious if in Your choices to “strengthen the good.. [behavioural habits] and remove the bad ones” there is any dsicussion or negotiation with Your pet… or is ot all up to the Dom/me? 🙂
Very interesting post, Master Stoltz, thank You.
This begs the question though…if training is done without the sub’s knowledge…is it brainwashing? And is that a bad thing if the ultimate behavior is a good one? Behavior modification (Skinner) and brainwashing…Now THERE’s a doctoral thesis!
🙂
I think the difference between Behavioral Modification and brainwashing is fear. Brainwashing uses fear to manipulate, while successful Behavioral Modification changes negative behavior so that positive results are achieved. Ideally of course! A sub will be pushed to step outside their limits for positive results as long as their Master has their best interests in mind. A sub is a reflection of the Dominant so why would the Dom want a messed up sub LOL?
It also begins with the assumption that the pet needs to be trained, that behavior modification is required. (Yeah I read Skinner in the 70’s Diana – even the stuff he did with Pigeon’s and Bombs in WW2:)
I consider my subbie perfectly herself and myself perfectly myself, so a scene is not me dominating to bend and shape her. My domination is simply that I make the decisions on how we will play and when we will play based on the negotiation(foreplay 🙂 that has happened in the past and the opportunity available in the present .
For example: today, I told her that I plan to tie her to a tree with a dozen leather straps arranged as a corset. I asked if she had a tripod for use as a PROP to explain to strangers walking by that this was a photo shoot, and yes she has a tripod and flash reflectors.
NOW – when the camera equipment goes in the back of the car next summer, she may or may not remember the negotiation. And it may or may not happen that day or two days later when she forgets the equipment, but the woman WILL be tied to a tree with leather straps corset style – toys and actions separately discussed to be included as I see fit. Whether this occurs in a cemetery, the woods, or my back yard first remains to be seen.
So to answer Cloud, my method (if it is a method) is entirely different. I seek not the result of ‘training’. I seek to unveil the connection available in the convergence of us, the situation, the actions taken and our history. And we both learn.
In our last public dungeon session, I learned that 4 cuffs, attached to 4 swing chains, 30 minutes with a rose flogger on her tits and a ball gag to suppress her animal snarls means that the 3rd time she came it was hard enough to walk the swing stand across the floor, leave permanent chain gouges in hardened leather cuffs and draw a crowd of women away from the caning next door to watch her writhe and heave.
This might be a predictable outcome, but it also helps me learn the range of safe motion we will need for rope suspension, the danger of letting her get excited in partial suspension, the value of head restraints, why I want a vibrator with me next time, etc.
She mentioned that she learned lessons about letting go to the point of being feral in public, that the biteable ball-gag is a real turnon, and that upper body based multiple orgasms can be a lot harder than she thought 🙂
And – oh yeah – I am really proud of my subbie, she’s a keeper 🙂
LOL…Your subbie also has a keeper of a Dom! She’s a lucky woman 🙂
I guess the discussion comes down to the word “training.” I had a Dom tell me once that there is no training, only do or don’t do (I told him he sounded like Yoda and he admitted to having similar philosophies with the little guy). His point was similar to yours, Secundo…in that the two of them (he and his sub) saw BDSM activities as parts of a journey they took together, eyes open, but with one leading and the other following. No training involved in simply walking a path together.
But being a teacher, I can also understand the training metaphor. You’re taking a sub from where she (he) is and moving her along a path to a new point, the same way teachers take their students from where they arrive in September to where they need to be by June. As teacher “train” students, so too, a Dom “trains” the sub…and the sub’s mindset.
I’m enjoying this discussion! Glad to see it’s still active 🙂
Secundo Sir… i have not a single intelligent question about your post. But i pay it very very close attention i assure you! Maybe… maybe after i sip some water…